AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 32 Bitcoin

config: default TrickleDelay to 1ms if non-positive

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Slyghtning

50/100 · Thin
config: default TrickleDelay to 1ms if non-positive
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes LND's configuration validation so that if a user sets the 'TrickleDelay' option to zero or a negative number, it is automatically reset to 1 millisecond. TrickleDelay controls how long the node waits before sending out batched gossip messages to peers. A zero or negative delay could break the trickle timer, likely causing messages to be sent continuously or the timer logic to fail. The fix is defensive: it prevents a misconfiguration from disabling or overloading the gossip trickle mechanism.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-severity hardening fix. Review whether TrickleDelay=0 or negative values could previously cause resource exhaustion or gossip storms, and consider whether the default should be the existing positive default rather than 1ms. No urgent action required unless the trickle timer is confirmed to misbehave with zero/negative values in production.

Security signals we found

01

Input validation/defaulting for a timing configuration parameter

02

Prevents non-positive timer interval that could disable or overload gossip trickling

03

No explicit security framing by the vendor in commit message or diff

04

Test added only validates the defaulting expression, not full ValidateConfig integration

Risk score

Why this scored 32/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.