AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 29 Bitcoin

docs: release-note zero-value WitnessUtxo remote-sign fix

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Olaoluwa Osuntokun

77/100 · Adequate
docs: release-note zero-value WitnessUtxo remote-sign fix

Add the bug-fix entry under 0.21.0 with a link to the PR.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides an explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is only a documentation update adding a release-note entry for an already-merged bug fix. The underlying fix changes how LND's remote-signer PSBT preparation handles zero-value previous outputs. It allows signing workflows for special Bitcoin transactions (BIP-322 'to_sign' transactions) where a previous output is required to have zero value. Previously, the remote signer silently dropped these inputs, causing a later signing step to fail with an error. There is no direct code change in this commit, only a description of the prior fix.

Recommended action

Review the actual code change in PR #10815 to confirm the fix correctly handles zero-value PrevOutputFetcher entries without introducing unintended signing behavior. Since this commit is only a release note, no immediate action is required beyond ensuring the note accurately reflects the fix.

Security signals we found

01

Bug fix described relates to PSBT signing flow failure

02

Previously skipped zero-value WitnessUtxo entries could break valid signing paths

03

No code change in this commit; only release-note documentation

Risk score

Why this scored 29/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.