AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

graph/db: fix HasNode comment

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ziggie

68/100 · Adequate
graph/db: fix HasNode comment

The comment was incorrectly referring to HasLightningNode but the
function is named HasNode. Update the comment to match the actual
function name.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only fixes a typo in a code comment, changing the name 'HasLightningNode' to 'HasNode' so it matches the actual function name. No code behavior was changed and there is no security impact.

Recommended action

No action required; this is a non-functional documentation-only change.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.