AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 19 Bitcoin

Remove deprecated `secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign` alias

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Sebastian Falbesoner

71/100 · Adequate
Remove deprecated `secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign` alias

This function has been deprecated since the rename to `_schnorrsig_sign32`
more than three and a half years ago (see PR #1089, commit 99e6568fc6),
before the first official release 0.2.0. Removing it should be fine by now.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit removes an old, renamed function called secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign from the libsecp256k1 cryptographic library. It had been marked as deprecated for over three years and was simply an alias pointing to the newer secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign32. Any software still using the old name will fail to compile or link after this change, but the actual signing behavior is unchanged. There is no security vulnerability introduced by this cleanup.

Recommended action

No security action required. Downstream projects should migrate any remaining calls from secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign to secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign32 before upgrading to the version containing this commit. Monitor release notes for breaking API changes.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant code change: only a deprecated alias and its test are removed

02

No memory safety, cryptographic, or input validation changes

03

No bug fix, vulnerability patch, or incident disclosure present in commit or references

Risk score

Why this scored 19/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.