AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 16 Bitcoin

ci, docker: Fix LLVM repository signature failure

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Hennadii Stepanov

91/100 · Strong
ci, docker: Fix LLVM repository signature failure

The LLVM apt repository uses legacy SHA1 signatures which are now
rejected by the stricter Sequoia PGP policy.

This change extends the 'sha1.second_preimage_resistance' cutoff date to
9999-01-01 in the default Sequoia config. This effectively whitelists
the legacy signature algorithm, preventing "OpenPGP signature
verification failed" errors during `apt-get update`.

See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/153385.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes a CI Docker build script so that an older SHA-1-based PGP signature from the LLVM apt repository is still accepted. It is a build-infrastructure workaround, not a change to the secp256k1 cryptographic code, and it does not introduce a vulnerability in the library itself.

Recommended action

No immediate security action is required for libsecp256k1. Monitor upstream LLVM issue #153385 and remove the workaround once LLVM's apt repository migrates to a stronger signature algorithm. Consider pinning the workaround to a specific, shorter cutoff date if feasible, and ensure the CI image is rebuilt from trusted base images.

Security signals we found

01

Configuration relaxation of PGP signature policy in CI environment

02

Use of SHA-1 signature algorithm whitelisted by date extension

03

Build-infrastructure-only change with no effect on shipped library

Risk score

Why this scored 16/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.