AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 54 Bitcoin

fix: preserve corrupt seeds.json instead of overwriting on store

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by odudex

85/100 · Strong
fix: preserve corrupt seeds.json instead of overwriting on store

store_encrypted_kef raises StorageCorruptedError and leaves the file
untouched when an existing seeds.json is malformed or a non-dict, rather
than silently overwriting recoverable data. list_mnemonics returns [] for
non-dict storage so corrupt files no longer crash the menu; the UI reports
the corruption (English-only) and skips the store.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bug in Krux, a Bitcoin hardware-wallet tool, where saving a new encrypted seed could silently overwrite a damaged seeds.json file. The patch makes the app detect corrupt or misshapen seed storage and stop the save, preserving the existing file so the user can recover it. It also prevents the seed list menu from crashing when the stored file is malformed. There is no evidence this was a malicious backdoor; it appears to be a defensive bug fix.

Recommended action

Review as a normal defensive fix. No urgent security response required. Verify that the English-only error string is acceptable for the project's localization policy, and consider whether users need documentation on how to recover a preserved corrupt seeds.json.

Security signals we found

01

Data-loss prevention: stops silent overwrite of recoverable seed storage

02

Defensive input validation: rejects non-dict JSON shape before write

03

Exception-based guard added to storage write path

04

UI now surfaces corruption instead of silently proceeding

05

No authentication, crypto, or access-control changes observed

Risk score

Why this scored 54/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.