AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 18 Bitcoin

Fix mnemonic printing issue with long words (#751)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Tads

73/100 · Adequate
Fix mnemonic printing issue with long words (#751)

* Fix mnemonic printing issue with long words

* fix device error when displaying backup as word numbers
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a layout bug in Krux, a Bitcoin hardware-wallet tool, that affected how mnemonic (seed phrase) words and their numeric equivalents are printed on thermal paper. Long words could previously wrap or collide with adjacent columns, making a paper backup harder to read or potentially ambiguous. The fix changes the print format from three narrow columns to two wider columns for word backups, and keeps three fixed-width columns for decimal/hex/octal number backups. It also moves some internal label constants to a shared location and corrects a device error when showing backups as word numbers. There is no evidence in the commit of a security vulnerability such as secret leakage or remote code execution.

Recommended action

Treat as a routine bug-fix/UX improvement. Reviewers may verify that the new 12-character fixed column width accommodates the longest BIP39 English word ('accomplice', 10 letters) plus the index prefix, and that numeric backups still fit within the printer's line width. No security-specific action is required.

Security signals we found

01

No secret exposure, memory corruption, or cryptographic weakness visible in the diff.

02

Change is purely presentational: paper-backup column layout and padding.

03

No network, input parsing, or privilege changes.

04

No vendor security framing or CVE references in commit message or changelog.

Risk score

Why this scored 18/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.