What changed, and why it matters
This commit only updates three version strings from a beta release to a stable release. It changes no code logic, no security settings, and no dependencies. There is nothing here that affects security.
No action needed. Treat as a routine release-version bump.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff updates the Krux version identifier from 25.11.beta2 to 26.03.0 in mkdocs.yml, pyproject.toml, and src/krux/metadata.py. No functional code, cryptographic constants, dependency pins, build scripts, or configuration defaults are modified. The SIGNER_PUBKEY in metadata.py remains unchanged.
Changed components
Inspect captured patch +3 / −3
diff --git a/mkdocs.yml b/mkdocs.yml
index 93d04ec..088fe2c 100644
--- a/mkdocs.yml
+++ b/mkdocs.yml
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ edit_uri: edit/main/docs
docs_dir: docs
site_dir: public
extra:
- latest_krux: krux-v25.11.beta2
+ latest_krux: krux-v26.03.0
latest_installer: v0.0.21
latest_installer_rpm: krux_installer-0.0.21-1.x86_64.rpm
latest_installer_deb: krux_installer_0.0.21_amd64.deb
diff --git a/pyproject.toml b/pyproject.toml
index 3bdd9eb..2612728 100644
--- a/pyproject.toml
+++ b/pyproject.toml
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
[tool.poetry]
name = "krux"
-version = "25.11.beta2"
+version = "26.03.0"
description = "Open-source signing device firmware for Bitcoin"
authors = ["Jeff S <jeffreesun@protonmail.com>"]
readme = "README.md"
diff --git a/src/krux/metadata.py b/src/krux/metadata.py
index d2b27c9..d4ebc55 100644
--- a/src/krux/metadata.py
+++ b/src/krux/metadata.py
@@ -19,5 +19,5 @@
# LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
# OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
# THE SOFTWARE.
-VERSION = "25.11.beta2"
+VERSION = "26.03.0"
SIGNER_PUBKEY = "03339e883157e45891e61ca9df4cd3bb895ef32d475b8e793559ea10a36766689b"
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.