AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 28 Bitcoin

fix ton forget

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ww3512687

28/100 · Opaque
fix ton forget
✓ Subject identifies a change! No meaningful explanatory body! Opaque security-relevant change
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit cleans up two places where TON (The Open Network) checksums were being converted to hex strings by hand-written loops, replacing them with a single helper function `ByteArrayToHexStr`. It also adds a debug print statement showing whether the TON and BIP39 mnemonic comparisons succeeded during the 'forget TON' flow. The title 'fix ton forget' suggests the change is meant to fix a bug in the process of forgetting/removing a TON wallet, but the diff itself does not show an obvious security vulnerability or a clear behavioral fix beyond code simplification and extra logging.

Recommended action

Treat this as a low-confidence maintenance commit. Review the full history around this change to identify the actual bug being fixed. Verify that `ByteArrayToHexStr` correctly null-terminates the output and handles the 65-byte buffer size. Consider whether the added `printf` in `ModelTonForgetPass` could leak sensitive comparison results to any accessible log interface, and remove or downgrade it if so.

Security signals we found

01

Refactoring of cryptographic checksum serialization

02

Use of safer-looking helper `ByteArrayToHexStr` instead of repeated `snprintf_s`

03

Debug logging added to sensitive mnemonic-comparison path

04

Commit title suggests bug fix in wallet deletion/forget flow

Risk score

Why this scored 28/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.