AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 32 Bitcoin

fix: slip39 passphrase create failed issue

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by soralit

57/100 · Thin
fix: slip39 passphrase create failed issue
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a build-configuration bug that could prevent creating or saving public key information when using a SLIP39 passphrase. The old code accidentally skipped the normal key-derivation path for certain crypto types in non-Bitcoin-only builds, which could leave required public key data unset and cause account setup to fail. The patch restructures the conditional compilation so each build variant (Cypherpunk, Web3, Bitcoin-only) follows the correct derivation branch.

Recommended action

Treat as a functional/availability fix rather than a confirmed exploitable vulnerability. Reviewers should verify that all build configurations (BTC_ONLY, WEB3_VERSION, CYPHERPUNK_VERSION, and combinations thereof) now derive every required public key type and that no path leaves xPubResult uninitialized. Regression tests for SLIP39 passphrase account creation and for each supported build variant should be added or confirmed.

Security signals we found

01

Conditional compilation (#ifdef) restructure around cryptographic key derivation

02

SLIP39 passphrase creation failure addressed

03

Cardano BIP32-ED25519 key derivation path corrected

04

Zcash UFVK encryption isolated under CYPHERPUNK_VERSION flag

05

Potential for missing/uninitialized public key data in account setup

Risk score

Why this scored 32/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.