AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 55 Bitcoin

use DestroyAccount if the AccountDataCheck found issues

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by aaron

50/100 · Thin
use DestroyAccount if the AccountDataCheck found issues
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how a hardware crypto wallet (Keystone 3) cleans up a damaged or half-finished user account. Previously, the boot-time cleanup routine erased the account's stored pages but did not always run the same full deletion path used for normal account deletion. The patch makes the boot-time cleanup call the standard DestroyAccount function instead, so the same steps (erasing secure-element keys, clearing public info, clearing passphrase, and resetting wallet data hash) happen consistently. This reduces the chance that a partially deleted account leaves sensitive fragments behind after an unexpected reboot.

Recommended action

Treat as a hardening/cleanup fix. Review that DestroyAccount() is safe to call from the boot-time AccountsDataCheck() context (no recursion, no lock issues, no UI dependencies), and verify that the new ordering does not skip necessary error handling when SE_EraseAccount() fails. Consider whether the change warrants a firmware release note about improved secure cleanup after interrupted operations.

Security signals we found

01

Incomplete account deletion could leave secure-element key material or wallet metadata after power loss / interrupted operation

02

AccountsDataCheck boot recovery previously duplicated only part of DestroyAccount's cleanup

03

Patch consolidates cleanup through DestroyAccount to reduce inconsistent deletion states

04

Deletion ordering changed so metadata/public-info/passphrase clearing happens before status is marked UNKNOWN

Risk score

Why this scored 55/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 10/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.