AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 57 Bitcoin

add the se wipe and reorder the ErasePublicInfo to fix the power lose issue

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by aaron

50/100 · Thin
add the se wipe and reorder the ErasePublicInfo to fix the power lose issue
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes the factory-reset/wipe routine in a Keystone hardware wallet's startup self-check. It replaces one wipe step with a call to wipe the secure element (SE_WipeAll) and moves the 'ErasePublicInfo' step to occur after account destruction and flash erasure, right before the device reboots. The stated goal is to fix a problem where losing power during a wipe could leave sensitive data partially intact. The change is defensive, but because it is a partial patch and the commit message is terse, we cannot fully verify that the new ordering eliminates all power-loss recovery risks.

Recommended action

Treat as a security-hardening fix for a potential data-remanence/power-loss failure mode. Review the full wipe routine for atomic progress tracking, verify that SE_WipeAll and ErasePublicInfo cannot be interrupted in a way that leaves recoverable key material, and confirm whether this change corresponds to a disclosed vulnerability or bug report. If the device has a tamper/factory-reset trigger, ensure the new ordering does not introduce a window where an attacker can abort reset before the secure element is wiped.

Security signals we found

01

Secure-element wipe added to factory-reset path

02

Flash/public-info erasure reordered before final system reset

03

Commit message frames change as fixing power-loss-related data-remanence issue

04

No visible persistence of wipe-progress state or rollback guard in diff

Risk score

Why this scored 57/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.