AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 33 Bitcoin

feat(zcash): aggregate migration review

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Adam Tucker

57/100 · Thin
feat(zcash): aggregate migration review
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a new compact review screen for batches of Zcash 'migration' transactions (moving funds from the Orchard pool to the newer Ironwood pool). It also fixes a small user-experience issue: the device will no longer auto-lock while a long batch of transactions is loading or being signed. The change is a feature addition with defensive checks, not a fix for an active security bug.

Recommended action

Treat as a normal feature commit. Reviewers should verify that the shape checks in `require_migration_display_shape` and `summarize_migration_actions` cannot be bypassed, that checked arithmetic covers all aggregation paths, and that the new FFI path does not leak `DisplayPczt` allocations on error (the commit explicitly defers display struct construction until after fallible steps).

Security signals we found

01

New transaction-parsing path for batch Zcash PCZTs with shape validation and checked arithmetic

02

Fallback to full per-message review when compact summary cannot safely represent a child

03

Wallet-ownership check on migration Ironwood outputs

04

Rejection of transparent inputs/outputs in migration summary to prevent hidden fee understatement

05

Auto-lock timeout reset during long batch loading/signing to avoid UI lockout

Risk score

Why this scored 33/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.