AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 42 Bitcoin

fix avax parse

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ww3512687

28/100 · Opaque
fix avax parse
✓ Subject identifies a change! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes how Keystone 3 hardware wallets parse Avalanche (AVAX) transactions. Previously, the code only handled a single derivation path and a single sender address. The update supports multiple input addresses/paths, correctly matches displayed 'from' addresses to their derivation paths, and fixes a UI layout and memory cleanup issue. The main security risk is that a malformed or multi-input AVAX transaction could have been displayed misleadingly, potentially tricking a user into approving a transaction they did not intend to sign.

Recommended action

Treat this as a likely security-relevant bug fix. Review whether the previous single-address parsing could have caused misleading transaction confirmation for multi-input AVAX transactions. Verify the new multi-path derivation and address matching behave correctly across X-Chain, P-Chain, and C-Chain import/export transactions. Consider whether a security advisory or CVE is warranted if user funds could have been at risk.

Security signals we found

01

UI display of transaction senders changed from single address to multiple addresses

02

Derivation path matching logic changed from single-path to multi-path iteration

03

Memory deallocation for 'from' vector re-enabled after struct type change

04

UI layout constant changed from 60 to 65 pixels to accommodate multiple entries

Risk score

Why this scored 42/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.