AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 12 Bitcoin

test: fix unit test

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by soralit

50/100 · Thin
test: fix unit test
✓ Subject identifies a change✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a test-only refactor that makes random number generation injectable so unit tests can use a fixed seed and produce deterministic results. It does not change the production code path: the firmware still uses the hardware random number generator (OsRng) when signing real Monero transactions. The expected test output was updated because the deterministic test RNG now produces different, predictable values.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as normal test/maintenance refactor. If reviewing for supply-chain risk, verify that rand_core 0.6.4 is the expected workspace version and that OsRng remains available in the no_std firmware build.

Security signals we found

01

No security fix or vulnerability patch is present in the diff.

02

Production randomness source remains OsRng; no downgrade to weak RNG.

03

Deterministic RNG is used only in #[cfg(test)] blocks.

04

No bounds checks, memory safety, cryptographic algorithm, or key-handling changes.

Risk score

Why this scored 12/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.