AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 41 Bitcoin

update the string and fix the pages reused

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by aaron

45/100 · Thin
update the string and fix the pages reused
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a page-number overlap in the secure-element storage layout and updates a user-facing help string. Previously, the RSA hash page was defined as page 36, which was also used for account status. The change gives the RSA hash its own dedicated pages (39-41) so the two purposes no longer share the same storage page. The string change makes it clearer that entering another wallet's PIN/password is part of resetting a forgotten passcode, and that failure wipes the device. The commit itself does not show an attack path, but it removes a condition that could have caused data corruption or misinterpretation of wallet state.

Recommended action

Review the secure-element manager code that reads and writes pages 36-38 and 39-41 to confirm the overlap is fully resolved in all call sites, including any factory-reset or migration paths. Verify that legacy devices upgrading from firmware using page 36 for RSA hash are handled safely (e.g., the old value is invalidated or migrated). The string change is a UX improvement and does not require a security response.

Security signals we found

01

Secure-element page-number collision fixed (page 36 reused for both account status and RSA primes hash)

02

New dedicated RSA hash pages (39-41) introduced to prevent overlapping storage use

03

User-facing string clarified to indicate passcode-reset context and device-wipe consequence

04

No input validation, buffer handling, or cryptographic logic changes visible in diff

Risk score

Why this scored 41/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 12/30
Exploitability 8/25
Stealth signal 7/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.