AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 31 Bitcoin

fix ton wallet regenerate

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ww3512687

35/100 · Opaque
fix ton wallet regenerate
✓ Descriptive subject! No meaningful explanatory body! Opaque security-relevant change
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This firmware patch changes how TON (The Open Network) wallet public keys are regenerated and how the wallet's 'manage' flag is set. Previously, TON wallets were skipped during normal public-key regeneration and were given a special 'manage' flag. The fix removes those special cases so TON wallets go through the same key-generation path as other wallets, and it prevents public-key switching for TON mnemonics. The change appears to correct a functional bug where TON wallet data could become stale or inconsistent after regenerating or switching accounts, but the commit does not describe it as a security vulnerability.

Recommended action

Treat as a functional/robustness fix unless additional context shows the TON regeneration bug could lead to address reuse, stale keys, or incorrect transaction signing. Firmware maintainers should verify that TON accounts now regenerate consistently across account creation, restore, and switch flows, and that the early return in `AccountPublicInfoSwitch` does not leave stale public info in memory. Users relying on TON should update to the patched firmware once released.

Security signals we found

01

Functional bug fix in wallet key regeneration logic

02

TON wallet previously bypassed standard public-info refresh loop

03

TON wallet no longer marked as 'manage' coin alongside BTC/ETH

04

Public-key switching now explicitly disabled for TON mnemonic type

05

No explicit security claim, CVE, or advisory in commit or references

Risk score

Why this scored 31/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.