AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 36 Bitcoin

Merge pull request #641 from Foundation-Devices/SFT-7112-single-line-signmessage

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by mjg-foundation

73/100 · Adequate
Merge pull request #641 from Foundation-Devices/SFT-7112-single-line-signmessage

SFT-7112: handled signing the single-line message format
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds support for a new single-line message-signing format used by Foundation's Envoy app. It also tightens parsing so that multi-line files split on all line endings (not just '\n') and so that embedded newlines in the single-line format are rejected rather than silently dropped. The change is a feature addition with defensive hardening, not a clear fix for an active vulnerability.

Recommended action

Review the new single-line parser for path-traversal or injection issues, confirm that get_addr_type_from_deriv() cannot be tricked by unusual path components, and ensure the strict validation rules are consistently enforced across all signing entry points. No urgent patch is indicated from the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

New input format parsing added to signing/health-check flow

02

Embedded newline handling changed from silent truncation to validation rejection

03

Address type now derived from derivation path for single-line format

04

Strict ASCII/whitespace checks applied to both normal signing and health-check modes

05

Unit tests added for validation edge cases

Risk score

Why this scored 36/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 7/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.