AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

rpc: fix fields type in man

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Ruslan Kasheparov

45/100 · Thin
rpc: fix fields type in man
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only updates the text descriptions and type annotations shown in RPC help/man pages. It does not change any executable code, validation logic, wallet behavior, or network handling. The changes make documentation more accurate (for example, correcting field names like 'fee reason' to 'fee_reason', marking optional fields, and adding missing Elements-specific fields), but they cannot be exploited or cause security problems.

Recommended action

No security action required; this is a documentation-only change. Treat as a normal code review item for accuracy of user-facing help text.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.