AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 27 Bitcoin

follow-up prev commit

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by ThomasV

28/100 · Opaque
follow-up prev commit
✓ Subject identifies a change! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a tiny follow-up patch that widens a type check in Electrum's wallet database code. When deleting or removing an item from a stored dictionary, the code now clears the parent pointer for any 'base stored object' rather than only for nested dictionaries. Without this fix, other stored object types (such as lists) might keep a stale reference to their former parent, which could lead to inconsistent database state or unexpected behavior when the data is later modified and saved.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-risk correctness fix. Review the preceding commit to understand the full context, run wallet database regression tests, and include in normal release testing. No urgent security response is indicated by this diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

Data-integrity fix in persistence layer

02

Reference lifecycle correction after deletion

03

Follow-up to an immediately preceding commit (suggests a related issue was being addressed)

Risk score

Why this scored 27/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 5/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.