CommitWatch RSS
AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

ci: add GitHub Actions submodule check workflow

EL93acf901 View source ↗
Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by f321x

57/100 · Thin
ci: add GitHub Actions submodule check workflow
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a new automated CI workflow that runs a submodule-checking script whenever a Git tag is pushed. It does not change application code, fix a bug, or alter security behavior of the Electrum wallet itself. It is purely an internal testing/verification automation addition.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as routine CI infrastructure change.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.

More from Electrum

Related watches

Informational 15 AI analysisMessage 78 · Adequate
EL ElectrumElectrum BitcoinSoftware wallets

Merge pull request #10988 from f321x/update_security_review_ci_model

This commit updates Electrum's internal CI (continuous integration) script that runs an automated security review using Anthropic's Claude Code tool. It changes the AI model version used for reviews from 'claude-opus-5' to 'claude-opus-5-5…

CI hardening: detects and reports AI model downgrades during automated security reviewNo changes to application code, cryptography, network protocol, or build artifactsNo privilege escalation, injection, or data-exfiltration vectors introduced by the diff
638fbba8by Felix+75−111 file
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Informational 12 AI analysisMessage 90 · Strong
EL ElectrumElectrum BitcoinSoftware wallets

ci: security review: warn if the model got downgraded

This commit updates Electrum's own CI security-review script. It adds detection and warnings when the automated code reviewer (Claude Code) silently falls back to a different AI model, for example after a content-policy refusal. It does no…

CI-only changeNo modification of wallet, crypto, networking, or build artifactsAdds detection for AI model fallback/downgrade in automated security review
ace2ca7aby f321x+74−101 file
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗
Low 44 AI analysisMessage 68 · Adequate
EL ElectrumElectrum BitcoinSoftware wallets

Merge pull request #10987 from spesmilo/fix_10986

This commit fixes a bug where Electrum failed to recognize certain already-signed Bitcoin transactions as complete. Specifically, for native SegWit inputs, Bitcoin Core can produce a finalized PSBT with a valid witness but an empty scriptS…

Logic error in transaction completeness detectionNative SegWit witness handling edge casePSBT interoperability issue with Bitcoin Core
bef80421by ghost43+11−02 files
No security note in commit
Open full analysis →Source commit ↗