AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 18 Bitcoin

Merge pull request #11092 from f321x/qml_address_history_labels

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Felix

73/100 · Adequate
Merge pull request #11092 from f321x/qml_address_history_labels

qml: use callback for label updates, fix stale label
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a UI bug in Electrum's QML (mobile-style) interface where transaction and address labels could become stale or fail to update after editing. It replaces a fragile manual callback system with a proper event listener so the wallet's label-change notifications automatically refresh the displayed labels. There is no direct security vulnerability here; it is a correctness and usability fix for label synchronization.

Recommended action

Treat as a normal bug-fix merge. No urgent security action required. Reviewers may want to verify that the new `label_changed` callback is always unregistered and that `get_txids_with_label_derived_from` handles all expected key types safely, but the patch includes tests covering the main cases.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant signals in diff: no privilege escalation, injection, cryptographic, or authentication changes.

02

Fixes a UI consistency bug (stale labels) that could mislead users but does not enable direct exploitation.

03

Adds event-listener lifecycle management (register/unregister on destroy) to prevent dangling callbacks and potential use-after-free patterns.

04

Refactors label normalization (newline stripping) into a single helper, reducing risk of inconsistent handling.

Risk score

Why this scored 18/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.