AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 35 Bitcoin

qml: FeePicker: restrict abs/rate editing to mimic wallet.bump_fee/cpfp

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by SomberNight

50/100 · Thin
qml: FeePicker: restrict abs/rate editing to mimic wallet.bump_fee/cpfp
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit tightens the user interface for fee editing in Electrum's mobile/QML wallet. Previously, users could freely type either a fee rate or a total absolute fee when bumping or cancelling transactions. Now, the app restricts which of those two inputs is shown depending on the operation, matching the rules already enforced by the underlying wallet code. This reduces the chance that a user accidentally creates an invalid or exploitable transaction by entering a fee value the wallet logic does not expect.

Recommended action

Review the underlying wallet.bump_fee and wallet.cpfp implementations to confirm they reject unexpected fee inputs, since this patch only restricts the GUI. Consider whether any other dialogs or flows using FeePicker should also restrict absolute or rate editing. No urgent action is required; this appears to be a defensive UI-hardening change.

Security signals we found

01

UI input restriction to match backend transaction finalizer logic

02

Prevents user from supplying absolute fee where only fee rate is expected, and vice versa

03

Reduces risk of fee-related transaction construction errors or edge-case abuse

04

No backend validation changes; relies on existing wallet.bump_fee/cpfp behavior

Risk score

Why this scored 35/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 6/25
Stealth signal 7/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.