AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 31 Bitcoin

qml: rbf/cancel: abort update if adding tx info fails

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by f321x

93/100 · Strong
qml: rbf/cancel: abort update if adding tx info fails

Early return the update() methods of QETxRbfFeeBumper and QETxCanceller
if it fails to fetch missing tx information from the Network to prevent
an exception in `Abstract_Wallet.bump_fee()` and
`Abstract_Wallet.dscancel()`. See
https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/5502#issuecomment-40213084270
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a crash in Electrum's mobile-style QML user interface when users try to speed up (RBF) or cancel a transaction while the app hasn't finished downloading all the transaction details from the network. Previously the app would throw an exception; now it shows a warning and stops gracefully. It is a robustness fix, not a security vulnerability that lets an attacker steal funds.

Recommended action

Treat as a normal bug/crash-fix commit. No urgent security response required. Users on affected versions may experience UI crashes when bumping/cancelling transactions offline or before network sync; updating removes that crash.

Security signals we found

01

Crash/DoS hardening in QML fee-bumping flow

02

Missing network data handled defensively instead of raising exception

03

No cryptographic, authentication, or permission bypass observed

Risk score

Why this scored 31/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.