AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 33 Bitcoin

Fix checksum following BIP-128 standard

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Oren

68/100 · Adequate
Fix checksum following BIP-128 standard

Non-Ascii characters should not be converted for
checksum calculation.
This will give consistent hash to BIP-128 and its
Javascript code example.

Timelock-Recovery Plans that contained only ascii
characters are not affected.

Also, 8 hex-chars is enough for a checksum.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes how a recovery-plan checksum is calculated in Electrum's timelock recovery plugin. Previously, non-English characters were being converted to ASCII escape sequences before hashing, which could produce a different checksum than expected by the BIP-128 standard. The fix makes hashing consistent with the standard and shortens the displayed checksum to 8 hex characters. Plans that used only ordinary ASCII characters are unaffected.

Recommended action

Treat as a compatibility/standards-compliance fix. Review whether any previously created recovery plans with non-ASCII characters need re-checksumming, and confirm that 8 hex characters provides sufficient collision resistance for the intended threat model. No immediate emergency response is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

checksum algorithm mismatch with published standard (BIP-128)

02

non-ASCII data silently hashed differently than users/standard expect

03

truncated digest reduces checksum collision resistance

04

no input validation or signature added in patch

Risk score

Why this scored 33/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.