AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 18 Bitcoin

commands: reverse_swap: don't require provider_mining_fee in dryrun

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by SomberNight

50/100 · Thin
commands: reverse_swap: don't require provider_mining_fee in dryrun
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a small user-interface bug in Electrum's command-line reverse-swap command. It makes the provider_mining_fee argument optional during a 'dryrun' preview, and corrects a typo in an error message. There is no direct evidence this is a security vulnerability.

Recommended action

No security action required; treat as normal usability/bug-fix commit.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant code change: only argument default and error-message typo fixed

02

Assertion guarding real swap execution remains intact

03

No input validation, cryptographic, or authorization changes

Risk score

Why this scored 18/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.