AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Bitcoin

ServerConnectWizard: don't set autoconnect on user cancel

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by f321x

78/100 · Adequate
ServerConnectWizard: don't set autoconnect on user cancel

Don't set the NETWORK_AUTO_CONNECT config if the user checked the custom
server config checkbox and then cancels the wizard, so the next time the
user starts the wizard they again will have the choice instead of
silently being forced into a random server.
Currently if the user cancels the wizard during the network config the
welcome component will already have set the NETWORK_AUTO_CONNECT config
to False (as the user selected the custom server checkbox), preventing
the wizard from starting again on the next startup.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change fixes a small user-experience bug in Electrum's first-run network setup wizard. Previously, if a user chose to manually configure a server but then closed the wizard without finishing, the wallet would remember that choice and skip the wizard on the next launch, silently connecting to a random server instead. Now the wizard will reappear until the user completes or explicitly accepts the setup. There is no direct theft-of-funds or remote-code-execution vulnerability here.

Recommended action

No urgent security action required. Treat as a normal bug-fix / UX-hardening patch. Users who previously cancelled the wizard and want manual server selection may need to re-run the wizard once after updating.

Security signals we found

01

Behavioral change in network connection policy

02

Fixes unintended persistent configuration side effect from UI cancellation

03

Reduces risk of user being connected to an unexpected/default server without explicit consent

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.