AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 33 Bitcoin

Allow high remote `dust_limit_satoshis` (#3215)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Bastien Teinturier

88/100 · Strong
Allow high remote `dust_limit_satoshis` (#3215)

Now that we only accept anchor output channels and beyong, we should
let our peers use high `dust_limit_satoshis` values to ensure that the
transaction outputs are economically spendable.

We can't yet raise our `dust_limit_satoshis`: we must first accept high
values, and in the next release (and once other implementations support
it as well), then we'll be able to increase our default value.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit raises the maximum dust limit Eclair will accept from remote Lightning peers from 600 to 10,000 satoshis. Dust limits determine the smallest transaction output a channel will create. The change is framed as a forward-compatibility and economic-spendability improvement for newer 'anchor output' channels, not as a security fix. It does not change Eclair's own dust limit (still 546 satoshis).

Recommended action

Treat as a normal protocol-parameter tuning change. Review whether 10,000 satoshis is consistent with current BOLT specifications and peer implementation limits. Monitor for any follow-up commits that raise Eclair's own `dust-limit-satoshis`. No immediate security response is indicated by the commit content.

Security signals we found

01

Configuration change affecting channel output trimming policy

02

Dust limit directly influences UTXO creation and potential dust exposure

03

No input validation, cryptographic, or authorization change

04

No mention of CVE, vulnerability, bug, or exploit in commit or title

Risk score

Why this scored 33/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 7/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.