AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 22 Bitcoin

Use bitcoin-lib 0.47 (#3268)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Fabrice Drouin

76/100 · Adequate
Use bitcoin-lib 0.47 (#3268)

* Use bitcoin-lib 0.47

* Add checksums for secp256k1-kmp 0.23.0

* der2compact() and compact2der() methods have been removed, new signInputCompact() method has been added

* Use Transaction.encodeWitnessEcdsaSig() instead of low-level calls

* Replace local der() methode with bitcoin-lib's encodeWitnessEcdsaSig()
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit updates Eclair to use a newer version of its underlying Bitcoin library (bitcoin-lib 0.47). Most changes are mechanical: replacing local helper functions with new library-provided equivalents for encoding signatures and signing transaction inputs. There is no direct evidence in the commit message or diff that this fixes a specific security vulnerability, but it does touch cryptographic code and updates a dependency, which can sometimes address bugs or weaknesses in the library itself.

Recommended action

Review the bitcoin-lib 0.47 and secp256k1-kmp 0.23.0 release notes or changelog for any security-related fixes. Verify that the new library APIs preserve low-s normalization and correct sighash behavior, since these are critical for Lightning transaction validity. Run the full transaction and signature test suites to ensure no regressions.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency version bump for bitcoin-lib and secp256k1-kmp

02

Refactor of ECDSA signature encoding/signing code paths

03

Removal of local DER conversion helpers in favor of library-provided methods

04

No explicit security fix or CVE referenced in commit message or diff

Risk score

Why this scored 22/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 4/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.