AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 29 Bitcoin

testing: block_h bumped for SSSP too, when CCC overrides SSSP block

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by scgbckbone

60/100 · Adequate
testing: block_h bumped for SSSP too, when CCC overrides SSSP block
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bookkeeping bug in the COLDCARD firmware's transaction-signing logic. When two optional security features—SSSP (a spending velocity limit) and CCC (a policy that can override SSSP)—are both active, the block-height tracker for SSSP was not being updated in one specific case where CCC allowed a transaction that SSSP would have blocked. The fix ensures both trackers stay in sync, so SSSP's velocity limit remains accurate after an override. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this is exploitable as a security vulnerability; it reads as a test-driven correctness fix.

Recommended action

Treat as a normal correctness/test fix. Review whether the stale block_h value could have caused any policy bypass in prior firmware versions, but the commit itself does not present evidence of an exploitable security flaw. No urgent vendor disclosure action is required based solely on this commit.

Security signals we found

01

State-synchronization fix between two policy enforcement features

02

Regression test added for override interaction

03

No mention of CVE, advisory, or security disclosure in commit or diff

04

Change is small, comment-only in production code plus tests

Risk score

Why this scored 29/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 5/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.