AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

docs: why RNG clock errors don't invalidate RNG_DR

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by scgbckbone

74/100 · Adequate
docs: why RNG clock errors don't invalidate RNG_DR
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Explains rationale or failure mode! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds explanatory comments to two source files about why the COLDCARD firmware ignores certain hardware random-number-generator clock-error flags. It does not change any code behavior. The comments cite ST documentation saying these clock errors do not affect the quality of random numbers and that a dead clock is still caught by a data-ready timeout. There is no security-relevant code change.

Recommended action

No action required. This is a documentation-only change. If reviewing for security, verify separately that the cited ST documentation and errata accurately support the design decision to ignore CEIS/CECS.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.