AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 12 Bitcoin

(some) policy test for sssp

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by scgbckbone

55/100 · Thin
(some) policy test for sssp
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a routine test-suite addition for the COLDCARD's Single Signer Spending Policy (SSSP) feature. It adds automated tests that verify the spending policy correctly allows or blocks transactions based on configured limits (amount, velocity, whitelist). The only production code change is removing an unreachable 'return default' line after a function that always raises an exception, which has no security effect.

Recommended action

No action required; this is a benign test-only commit with a trivial dead-code cleanup.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant production code change

02

Dead code removal only (unreachable return after raise)

03

Test-only addition for spending policy enforcement

Risk score

Why this scored 12/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.