What changed, and why it matters
This commit makes only cosmetic changes to the COLDCARD firmware: it changes a screen title from 'WIF' to 'WIF Key' and adds a few blank lines for readability. There is no functional code change and no security impact.
No action required; this is a cosmetic/style-only change.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff in shared/wif.py alters the title parameter passed to ux_show_story() from ‘WIF’ to ‘WIF Key’ and inserts whitespace lines. No logic, validation, cryptography, or access-control behavior is modified. The WIF import/store flow remains identical.
Changed components
shared/wif.pyInspect captured patch +3 / −1
diff --git a/shared/wif.py b/shared/wif.py
index 271c934..cbd9cd1 100644
--- a/shared/wif.py
+++ b/shared/wif.py
@@ -50,12 +50,13 @@ async def ux_visualize_wif(wif_str, kp, compressed, testnet):
pk = b2a_hex(kp.pubkey().to_bytes(not compressed)).decode()
msg = "%s\n\nchain: %s\n\nPrivkey:\n%s\n\nPubkey:\n%s" % (wif_str, ch_str, sk, pk)
esc = ""
+
if compressed and (testnet == (chains.current_chain().ctype != "BTC")):
# we only support compressed in WIF store
msg += "\n\nPress (1) to import to WIF Store."
esc += "1"
- ch = await ux_show_story(msg, title="WIF", escape=esc)
+ ch = await ux_show_story(msg, title="WIF Key", escape=esc)
if ch == "1":
saved = settings.get("wifs", [])
if (pk, sk) in saved:
@@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ async def ux_visualize_wif(wif_str, kp, compressed, testnet):
saved.append((pk, sk))
settings.set('wifs', saved)
settings.save()
+
await ux_show_story("Saved to WIF Store.", title="Success")
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.