AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Critical 100 Bitcoin

cautions

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Peter D. Gray

0/100 · Opaque
cautions
! Very short subject! Too few words to establish purpose! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a security advisory to the COLDCARD firmware README. Coinkite states that firmware releases from 2021 through July 2026 contained a bug that produced weak randomness (poor entropy) when generating secrets such as wallet seed phrases. Because weak randomness can make private keys guessable by attackers, any Bitcoin or other cryptocurrency funds protected by seeds created on affected COLDCARD devices during that period may be at risk of theft. The advisory recommends regenerating seeds and moving funds immediately, and lists specific firmware versions where the issue is fixed. The commit itself only changes documentation; it does not contain the actual code fix.

Recommended action

Users with COLDCARD devices should verify whether their firmware version is within the affected range (2021 through July 2026, below the listed fixed releases). If affected, they should upgrade to a fixed firmware version, generate a new master seed in a known-safe manner (preferably with strong additional entropy such as a high-entropy BIP-39 passphrase and/or dice rolls), and move all funds from addresses derived from the old seed to addresses derived from the new seed as soon as possible. Review the linked Coinkite blog posts for detailed guidance and any further updates.

Security signals we found

01

Vendor self-disclosed security advisory in project README

02

Weak/poor entropy in cryptographic secret generation

03

Affected period spans multiple years (2021 to July 2026)

04

Recommendation to rotate secrets and move funds immediately

05

Fixed firmware versions explicitly listed

06

Documentation-only commit; actual patch is elsewhere

Risk score

Why this scored 100/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 30/30
Exploitability 25/25
Stealth signal 15/15
Affected reach 15/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.