AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 46 Monero

fix rive_common dependency

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Robert Malikowski

35/100 · Opaque
fix rive_common dependency
✓ Descriptive subject! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes the source of a software dependency called rive_common from one GitHub account (MrCyjaneK) to another (malik1004x). Dependencies are external code packages the app relies on. Switching to a different, unverified source could introduce malicious or vulnerable code into the wallet app, but the commit itself does not show any harmful code—only the source change. There is no vendor explanation or security disclosure provided.

Recommended action

Treat this change as a supply-chain risk until verified. Review the new repository at https://github.com/malik1004x/rive_common ref 34ef174e87dc4a29e728babfaad8dd9464b704ae for malicious modifications compared to the original upstream and the prior fork. Confirm the new fork is controlled by a trusted maintainer, pin the ref, verify checksums, and document the reason for the switch in the repository. Consider requiring code-owner approval for dependency-source changes.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency source changed to a different GitHub account without documented rationale

02

No commit message detail explaining why the original source was unsuitable

03

No checksum or provenance verification shown in the diff

04

Wallet application context increases sensitivity of supply-chain changes

Risk score

Why this scored 46/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 10/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 4/10
Evidence quality 2/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.