AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 27 Monero

feat: Add token to recieve address QR and link to pay anything flow on Solana and Tron, also fix token not showing on evm wallets QRs when scanned from dashboard (#3320)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by David Adegoke

70/100 · Adequate
feat: Add token to recieve address QR and link to pay anything flow on Solana and Tron, also fix token not showing on evm wallets QRs when scanned from dashboard (#3320)
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how Cake Wallet builds and reads QR-code payment links for Solana and Tron tokens, and fixes a bug where EVM token QR codes did not include the token identifier. It also refactors how the app looks up a token from its contract/mint address. The changes are feature additions and a bug fix; there is no direct evidence in the diff of a security vulnerability, but any change to payment URI parsing and token lookup can affect whether a user sends funds to the wrong token or wrong address.

Recommended action

Treat as a normal feature/bug-fix review. Verify that scanned contract/mint addresses are validated against the wallet's known token list before being presented as the active send asset, and confirm the URI parser rejects malformed or unexpected query parameters. No emergency response is indicated by the diff alone.

Security signals we found

01

Payment URI parsing now accepts contract/mint address parameters from external QR codes/scanned links

02

Token selection is driven by a parsed contract address, which could influence which asset the user is prompted to send

03

Refactored token lookup reduces code duplication but does not add new validation

04

No explicit security claim or advisory is made in the commit message

Risk score

Why this scored 27/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 3/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.