AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Moderate 58 Monero

fix: Add additional fees validation for native transaction (#2933)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by David Adegoke

70/100 · Adequate
fix: Add additional fees validation for native transaction (#2933)
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a safety check in Cake Wallet's Ethereum-compatible wallet to prevent users from creating native (non-token) transactions when the account does not have enough balance to cover both the amount being sent and the network transaction fee. Previously, the app only checked that the send amount itself was covered by the balance, which could allow a transaction to be created that would later fail or leave the account unexpectedly short. The fix throws a specific fee-related error when the combined amount plus estimated fees exceeds the available balance.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-to-moderate reliability/security fix. Review the full transaction creation flow to confirm no other balance/fee checks are missing, and verify that estimatedFeesForTransaction is computed consistently across all EVM chains and transaction types. Add regression tests for insufficient-balance scenarios including fees. No immediate incident response is indicated unless user reports of failed or stuck transactions surface.

Security signals we found

01

Insufficient funds validation gap in transaction creation

02

Native coin send could proceed without accounting for gas fees

03

New exception type introduced for fee-related failures

04

Partial patch: only adds one additional check; broader fee/estimation logic not reviewed

Risk score

Why this scored 58/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 18/30
Exploitability 12/25
Stealth signal 8/15
Affected reach 10/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.