AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 21 Monero

Add support for Ledger Nano Gen 5 (#2609)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Konstantin Ullrich

76/100 · Adequate
Add support for Ledger Nano Gen 5 (#2609)

* chore: update `ledger_flutter_plus` dependency to new repository URL and commit hash in `pubspec_base.yaml`

* feat: add support for Ledger Nano Gen 5 hardware wallet and include new SVG asset

* chore: update `ledger_flutter_plus` dependency reference and remove redundant method call in `LedgerViewModel`
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds support for a new Ledger hardware wallet model (Ledger Nano Gen 5) in the Cake Wallet app. It updates an internal device list, adds an icon, and switches the app to use a fork of the Ledger library maintained by Cake Wallet's own team. The code change also removes a redundant method argument when listening for device connection state changes. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this fixes a security vulnerability; it appears to be a routine feature addition and dependency maintenance change.

Recommended action

Review the differences between the old (`vespr-wallet/ledger-flutter-plus@60817d4b`) and new (`cake-tech/ledger-flutter-plus@5237e5b3`) dependency commits to confirm the fork does not introduce unexpected behavior or regressions. Verify the `deviceStateChanges` API change is compatible with the new fork. No immediate security patch action is indicated by this commit alone.

Security signals we found

01

Dependency source changed from third-party repository to vendor-owned fork

02

Dependency commit hash updated without disclosed vulnerability details

03

Hardware wallet integration code touched, but only device enumeration/display

Risk score

Why this scored 21/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 4/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.