AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Monero

CW-1368: Add Binance Smart Chain (#2836)

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by David Adegoke

76/100 · Adequate
CW-1368: Add Binance Smart Chain (#2836)

* feat: Add Binance Smart Chain support to wallet types and EVM chain registry

* feat: Add BSC node list and support in wallet type and chain ID mappings

* feat: Add BSC default tokens and update evm utility functions

* feat: Integrate BSC support in node settings and management

* feat: Add BSC support to config scripts and wallet type generation

* feat: Add BSC support to EVM chain ID and switcher

* feat: Extend BSC support in wallet utilities and chain type checks

* feat: Add BSC support to different wallet functions

* feat: Add BSCURI class and implement for uri handling

* feat: Update Android and iOS configurations to support BSC URL schemes

* feat: Add BSC support to different functionalities and settings

* refactor: Update wallet type name from'Binance Smart Chain' to BNB Smart Chain

* feat: Add switcher icon and updates token utils

* Review fixes

* More changes to BSC name, wallet listing and images

* Add more default tokens
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds support for the BNB Smart Chain (BSC) to the Cake Wallet app. It is a feature addition that introduces a new EVM-compatible blockchain alongside existing Ethereum, Polygon, Base, and Arbitrum support. There is no indication in the commit that this is a security fix or that it addresses any vulnerability. The changes are broad but routine: new wallet type, chain ID mappings, default nodes, default tokens, transaction handling, UI icons, URL schemes, and localization strings.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal feature review; verify BSC node list and token contract addresses are correct, and that the legacy gasPrice fallback in BSCClient behaves correctly under fee estimation.

Security signals we found

01

No security-relevant signals detected in the diff.

02

BSCClient explicitly avoids sending EIP-1559 fee fields to BSC RPC nodes, which is a compatibility choice, not a vulnerability fix.

03

No mention of CVE, advisory, bug bounty, researcher attribution, or security issue in commit title/message.

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.