AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 29 Monero

only check address validation once for old addresses

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Omar

50/100 · Thin
only check address validation once for old addresses
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how Cake Wallet verifies whether stored Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash addresses belong to the 'hidden' (change) side of a wallet. Previously, the app re-checked every address on every wallet open, which could flip address labels incorrectly if a stored address didn't match either the normal or hidden chain. Now it checks each old address only once, marks it as checked, and only flips the label if the address actually re-derives from the opposite chain. New addresses created by the wallet are marked correct-by-construction and skipped. The change is a correctness/performance fix rather than a clear security patch, but a mislabeled change address could in theory cause a user to share or reuse an address unexpectedly.

Recommended action

Review whether any persisted `BitcoinAddressRecord` objects from older app versions could have had `isHidden` flipped incorrectly before this fix; consider a one-time migration or audit log for affected wallets. Otherwise treat as a routine correctness/performance improvement.

Security signals we found

01

Address label (hidden/visible) correctness affects which addresses users believe are receive vs change addresses

02

Repeated re-derivation on every startup removed, reducing side-channel/performance exposure

03

Logic change prevents arbitrary flipping of `isHidden` for addresses that do not match either derivation path

04

No explicit security advisory, CVE, or bug bounty attribution in commit or references

Risk score

Why this scored 29/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.