What the developer wrote
Authored by Nicolas Dorier
Fix build
What changed, and why it matters
This is a one-line change in a test file that fixes a C# compiler/build error by switching from object-initializer syntax to a named parameter. It has no effect on the actual BTCPay Server application or its security.
No security action needed. Treat as a normal build/test maintenance commit.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The commit modifies BTCPayServer.Tests/UnitTest1.cs, replacing new() { ViewName = "Invoices" } with viewName: "Invoices" in a call to GetReport. This is purely a build-fixing syntax change in unit-test code. There is no runtime logic, no production-code change, and no security-relevant behavior.
Changed components
BTCPayServer.Tests/UnitTest1.csInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/BTCPayServer.Tests/UnitTest1.cs b/BTCPayServer.Tests/UnitTest1.cs
index 7dab105..5ffb29f 100644
--- a/BTCPayServer.Tests/UnitTest1.cs
+++ b/BTCPayServer.Tests/UnitTest1.cs
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ namespace BTCPayServer.Tests
Assert.Equal(comment, listedInvoice.Comment);
// The comment should be included in the invoices export/report
- var invoicesReport = await GetReport(acc, new() { ViewName = "Invoices" });
+ var invoicesReport = await GetReport(acc, viewName: "Invoices");
var reportInvoiceIdIndex = invoicesReport.GetIndex("InvoiceId");
var reportCommentIndex = invoicesReport.GetIndex("InvoiceComment");
Assert.Contains(invoicesReport.Data, d =>
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.