What the developer wrote
Authored by Nicolas Dorier
Fix test
What changed, and why it matters
This commit changes a single character in a test file, flipping a comparison operator from '==' to '!='. It is a test-only fix that corrects the logic of an assertion checking whether a UI alert appears. There is no change to production code and no security relevance.
No action required. This is a test-only change with no security implications.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
In BTCPayServer.Tests/SubscriptionTests.cs, the AssertNoCallToAction test was checking if no translucent alert divs were present by using CountAsync() == 0, then failing with the alert text. The corrected logic uses != 0 so the assertion actually fires when an alert exists. This is purely a unit/integration test correction.
Changed components
BTCPayServer.Tests/SubscriptionTests.csInspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/BTCPayServer.Tests/SubscriptionTests.cs b/BTCPayServer.Tests/SubscriptionTests.cs
index ab3c120..e6488fb 100644
--- a/BTCPayServer.Tests/SubscriptionTests.cs
+++ b/BTCPayServer.Tests/SubscriptionTests.cs
@@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ public class SubscriptionTests(ITestOutputHelper testOutputHelper) : UnitTestBas
public async Task AssertNoCallToAction()
{
await s.Page.WaitForLoadStateAsync(LoadState.DOMContentLoaded);
- if (await s.Page.Locator($"div.alert-translucent").CountAsync() == 0)
+ if (await s.Page.Locator($"div.alert-translucent").CountAsync() != 0)
{
var text = await s.Page.Locator($"div.alert-translucent").TextContentAsync();
Assert.Fail($"Call to action shouldn't have shown ({text})");
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.