AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

btcec/schnorr: fix nonce generation comments

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Erick Cestari

68/100 · Adequate
btcec/schnorr: fix nonce generation comments

The comments in schnorrSign and Sign incorrectly stated that CustomNonce
triggers RFC6979 nonce generation. The actual behavior is the opposite:

- With CustomNonce: BIP-340 compliant nonce derivation (steps 6-8)
- Without CustomNonce (default): RFC6979 deterministic nonce generation

Also fixes typo "set 14" -> "step 14".
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only fixes documentation comments in the code. It corrects a description about which nonce-generation method is used when a custom nonce option is provided. No actual signing logic or behavior was changed, so there is no security risk from this patch itself.

Recommended action

No security action needed; this is a documentation-only correction.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.