AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 31 Bitcoin

Fix: Swap A/B buttons logic for TTGO T-Display & T-Display S3

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Gustavo Cateim

62/100 · Adequate
Fix: Swap A/B buttons logic for TTGO T-Display & T-Display S3
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes the assignment of physical A and B buttons on two specific TTGO hardware boards used with the Jade crypto wallet. Previously, the button pins were swapped or set to invalid values, which could cause button presses to be misread or ignored. The fix corrects the pin mapping so the right physical button registers as the right logical action. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this is a security vulnerability, but in a hardware wallet, confusing or ignoring button confirmations could theoretically affect user confirmations of sensitive actions.

Recommended action

Treat as a functional bug fix rather than a security patch unless additional context shows that the swapped buttons could be exploited to bypass transaction confirmation. Users of TTGO T-Display and T-Display S3 boards should update to ensure buttons behave as expected. No immediate security response is indicated by the commit alone.

Security signals we found

01

Hardware wallet user-input pin mapping changed

02

Commit title frames change as a fix for swapped button logic

03

Potential for user confirmation actions to be triggered by the wrong physical button or not triggered at all

Risk score

Why this scored 31/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 6/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.