AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 29 Bitcoin

ui: increase gui stack size for builds with stack protection enabled

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Jon Griffiths

50/100 · Thin
ui: increase gui stack size for builds with stack protection enabled
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit slightly increases the memory stack reserved for the device's on-screen user-interface task. The change is specifically for builds that have 'stack protection' enabled, a compiler hardening feature. The one-line patch suggests that when stack protection is turned on, the GUI task was running out of stack space, which could cause crashes or instability. There is no direct evidence in the commit that this fixes an exploitable security vulnerability; it reads more like a hardening/stability fix.

Recommended action

Treat as a low-severity hardening/stability improvement. If stack protection is enabled in production builds, verify through runtime stack-high-water monitoring (uxTaskGetStackHighWaterMark) that 3,200 bytes is sufficient across all GUI screens and languages. Consider documenting the stack-protection requirement in build notes. No immediate incident response is warranted absent evidence of exploitation.

Security signals we found

01

Stack-size increase for a hardened build configuration

02

Implicit reference to stack-overflow risk when stack protection is enabled

03

Single-byte-boundary adjustment rather than a structural fix

Risk score

Why this scored 29/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.