What the developer wrote
Authored by hustrust
chore: remove redundant word
Signed-off-by: hustrust <hustrust@outlook.com>
What changed, and why it matters
This commit fixes a typo in a code comment by removing a duplicated word ('have have' → 'have'). It does not change any executable code, program logic, or security behavior.
No action required. This is a cosmetic documentation/comment cleanup with no security relevance.
Security signals we found
No strong security signals were identified.
Evidence from the diff
The diff is a single-character change in a C header file comment within main/process/process_utils.h. It removes a redundant ‘have’ from a human-readable comment describing the purpose of a helper macro. No source code, macros, function signatures, or compiled output are affected.
Changed components
Inspect captured patch +1 / −1
diff --git a/main/process/process_utils.h b/main/process/process_utils.h
index b104f86..6ad4ee0 100644
--- a/main/process/process_utils.h
+++ b/main/process/process_utils.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ bool jade_process_check_network(jade_process_t* process, CborValue* params, netw
goto cleanup; \
}
-// Do we have have a keychain, and does its userdata indicate the same 'source'
+// Do we have a keychain, and does its userdata indicate the same 'source'
// as the current message ?
// This is to check that we only handle messages from the same source (serial or ble)
// as initially unlocked the key material.
Why this scored 15/100
Community notes
Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.
The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.