AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

test: Scale feature_dbcrash.py timeout with factor

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by MarcoFalke

95/100 · Strong
test: Scale feature_dbcrash.py timeout with factor

This allows to run the test under valgrind:

./bld-cmake/test/functional/feature_dbcrash.py --timeout-factor=10 --valgrind

For testing, the same test can be run multiple times in parallel:

./bld-cmake/test/functional/test_runner.py -j 10 $( printf 'feature_dbcrash.py %.0s' {1..10} ) --timeout-factor=10 --valgrind

(Running the test under valgrind may take several hours!)

I found that before this commit, 9 out of the 10 runs failed via:

```
...
TestFramework (INFO): Iteration 36, generating 2500 transactions [11, 5, 6]
TestFramework (ERROR): Unexpected exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/b-c/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 142, in main
self.run_test()
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
File "/b-c/bld-cmake/test/functional/feature_dbcrash.py", line 262, in run_test
self.sync_node3blocks(block_hashes)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/b-c/bld-cmake/test/functional/feature_dbcrash.py", line 151, in sync_node3blocks
nodei_utxo_hash = self.restart_node(i, block_hash)
File "/b-c/bld-cmake/test/functional/feature_dbcrash.py", line 102, in restart_node
raise AssertionError(f"Unable to successfully restart node {node_index} in allotted time")
AssertionError: Unable to successfully restart node 0 in allotted time
```

With this commit, all 10 runs passed.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a test-only change. It makes one functional test wait longer before giving up when running under slow tools like valgrind. It does not change Bitcoin Core's production code, network behavior, or wallet security.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as a normal test reliability improvement.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.