AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

scripted-diff: LogPrintLevel(*,BCLog::Level::*,*) -> LogError()/LogWarning()

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by MarcoFalke

95/100 · Strong
scripted-diff: LogPrintLevel(*,BCLog::Level::*,*) -> LogError()/LogWarning()

This is a minimal behavior change and changes log output from:

[net:error] Something bad happened
[net:warning] Something problematic happened

to either

[error] Something bad happened
[warning] Something problematic happened

or, when -loglevelalways=1 is enabled:

[all:error] Something bad happened
[all:warning] Something problematic happened

Such a behavior change is desired, because all warning and error logs
are written in the same style in the source code and they are logged in
the same format for log consumers.

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-

sed --regexp-extended --in-place \
's/LogPrintLevel\((BCLog::[^,]*), BCLog::Level::(Error|Warning), */Log\2(/g' \
$( git grep -l LogPrintLevel ':(exclude)src/test/logging_tests.cpp' )

-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a purely cosmetic logging refactor. It changes the way some error and warning messages are written in the source code so that the resulting log output drops the source module prefix (like '[net:error]') and instead shows just '[error]' or '[warning]'. There is no change to program behavior, no bug fix, and no security issue.

Recommended action

No security action needed. Treat as a normal code-cleanup/refactor commit.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.