AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 21 Bitcoin

ci: Require rsync to pass

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by MarcoFalke

80/100 · Strong
ci: Require rsync to pass

In theory one could run the CI without the rsync package installed, and
with DANGER_RUN_CI_ON_HOST=1. However, this seems to be an edge case.
Simply requiring rsync to be installed is less code and avoids brittle
edge cases around rsync failures.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a small change to Bitcoin Core's internal continuous integration (CI) shell script. It removes a fallback message that previously printed if the rsync command failed, so rsync is now treated as a hard requirement. The change does not affect the Bitcoin network, wallets, consensus rules, or production nodes. It only matters if someone runs the CI system directly on their host machine without rsync installed, which the commit message itself calls an edge case.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as a normal CI maintenance commit. Reviewers may verify that CI runners have rsync installed, which is already the expected environment.

Security signals we found

01

Change is confined to CI infrastructure shell script

02

No modification of consensus, networking, wallet, or cryptographic code

03

No input validation, privilege boundary, or memory-safety change

04

Commit message frames change as code simplification, not as a vulnerability fix

Risk score

Why this scored 21/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 3/25
Stealth signal 2/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.