AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Bitcoin

wallet: Remove meaningless bool fallback in FundTransaction

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by MarcoFalke

73/100 · Adequate
wallet: Remove meaningless bool fallback in FundTransaction

The fallback was added in commit
af4fe7fd126eff2dd1942276ea91c8ab9dd717c6, more than a decade ago.

However, it is irrelevant, given that watch-only wallet is not a concept
anymore after commit 1337c72198a7d32935431d64e9e58c12f9003abc.

So remove the code.

Can be reviewed with the --ignore-all-space option.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit removes an old backward-compatibility feature in Bitcoin Core's wallet RPC command `fundrawtransaction`. Previously, callers could pass a plain `true` or `false` as the second argument, which was silently ignored. Now, passing a boolean triggers a clear JSON type error, and callers must use the normal options object. This is a cleanup change, not a security fix, but it makes the API stricter and easier to reason about.

Recommended action

No urgent action. Operators or tools that still pass a bare boolean to `fundrawtransaction` must update to use the options object. Reviewers should confirm the removed behavior was indeed unused and that no other RPC relies on `.skip_type_check = true` for this argument.

Security signals we found

01

Removal of a no-op backward-compatibility code path that silently accepted arbitrary boolean values

02

Stricter RPC input validation: bare booleans now rejected with a JSON type error

03

No memory safety, cryptographic, or consensus changes observed

04

No explicit security relevance stated by the author

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.